Woodbury v. Allan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 13, Jan. T., 1906, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Nov. T., 1904, No. 2, dismissing bill in equity in case of W. K. Woodbury v. William L. Allan, Clyde G. Allan and M. Louisa Allan. Bill in equity for an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Frror assigned among others was in dismissing the bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Potter,
The premises of appellant in this case are situated on the south side of Mahantongo street in the borough of Pottsville, and have a frontage of forty-one feet on said street, and a depth of forty feet. The property adjoins that of J. H. Zerbey, in whose case, which raised substantially the same questions as those here involved, an opinion has just been filed. The deeds to the property of the appellant in this case do not vest in him any express right to the use of the alley, on the east side of the Zerbey lot. But the bill avers that the alleyway on the east of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yeakle v. NaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
- Lindeman v. LindseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Nitzell v. PaschallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1831
- Bright v. AllanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
3Cited by7 opinions
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Mitchell v. BovardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Aldine Realty Co. v. Manor Real Estate & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Deeb v. FerrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Nauman v. KopfSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.