Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Bovard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1924No. Appeal, No. 125PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

Ingram owned a farm in Chartiers Township, Allegheny County, and, in 1884, divided a portion into seven lots, as appears by a recorded plan. The remaining part on the north was separated by a fence then standing. Along and to the south of it, a street, to be known as “Phillips,” was marked off, though never opened for use. Five of the parcels sold called for the proposed highway as a boundary, and, in two instances, the courses named in the conveyances extended the lines across it, though the reservation was made therein that they were subject “to the said…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richmond v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Higgins v. Borough of SharonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Yeakle v. NaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
  4. Lindeman v. LindseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  5. Zerbey v. AllanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rahn v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Percy A. Brown & Co. v. RaubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Shipler v. New Castle Paper Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Lenhart v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API