Legal Opinion

Bonner v. City of Brighton

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 2012No. Docket No. 302677PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARKEY, EJ.

Defendant-counterplaintiff, city of Brighton (the city), appeals by leave granted the trial court’s order granting partial summary disposition in favor of plaintiffs. The trial court determined that § 18-59 of the Brighton Code of Ordinances (BCO) violates substantive due process when it permits the city to have an unsafe structure demolished as a public nuisance, without providing the owner the option to repair it, if the structure is deemed unreasonable to repair, which is presumed when repair costs would exceed 100 percent of the structure’s true cash value as reflected in the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. MacK v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. AFT Michigan v. MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Wells Fargo Bank v. Cherryland Mall Ltd. PartnershipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Wayne County Employees Retirement System v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Vivian Nickens v. Cheryl ThomasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API