Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank v. Cherryland Mall Ltd. Partnership

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 2013No. Docket No. 304682PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND

2Per curiam

This case is before us on remand from our Supreme Court for reconsideration of our prior decision in this matter in light of the Legislature’s recent passage of the Nonrecourse Mortgage Loan Act, 2012 PA 67, MCL 445.1591 et seq. (the NMLA or Act 67). Wells Fargo Bank v Cherryland Mall Ltd Partnership, 493 Mich 859 (2012). On reconsideration, we reject plaintiffs constitutional challenges to the NMLA and hold that it bars plaintiffs claims.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts are set forth at length in our original opinion, Wells Fargo Bank, NA v Cherryland Mall Ltd Partnership,…

3Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Klein v. HP Pelzer Automotive Systems, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. AFT Michigan v. MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Santander Consumer USA Inc v. State TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Borman, LLC v. 18718 Borman, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. Trantham v. State Disbursement UnitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API