Toelcke v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity Fund
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Justice.
This is an appeal from an Industrial Commission determination that the Industrial Special Indemnity Fund (ISIF) is not responsible for any portion of Marie Toelcke’s total and permanent disability benefits. We affirm.
BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
On January 9, 1991, Marie Toelcke injured her back while working as a custodian for E G & G Idaho, Inc. Toelcke filed a worker’s compensation claim against her employer on January 9, 1995, which was settled on September 6, 1995. Two years later, Toelcke filed a claim against the ISIF seeking total permanent disability benefits.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Curtis v. Shoshone County Sheriff's OfficeIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Royce v. Southwest Pipe of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Gugelman v. Pressure Treated Timber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Dumaw v. J.L. Norton LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Archer v. Bonners Ferry DatsunIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Quincy v. QuincyIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Stanley v. Idaho Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2021