Legal Opinion

Quincy v. Quincy

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2001No. 26049PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice.

The State of Idaho, Industrial Special Indemnity Fund (“ISIF”), appeals the Industrial Commission decision apportioning liability to the ISIF for injuries suffered by the claimant, Rick Quincy.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Rick Quincy (Claimant), spent his entire life in the small rural community of Emida, Idaho, performing logging work. Claimant’s medical problems began in 1976 when, at the age of 17, he was involved in a motorcycle accident. Claimant underwent several surgeries, and eventually ended up with a limp and stiff ankle, osteoporosis, and a right leg one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carey v. Clearwater County Road DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Smith v. J.B. Parson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Dumaw v. J.L. Norton LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Toelcke v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hope v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Kevin D. Hope v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API