Legal Opinion
Boudreaux v. Banctec, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided February 22, 2005No. Civ.A. 03-2111PublishedCited by 219 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
BERRIGAN, District Judge.
Before the Court are cross-motions for Partial Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, both motions are DENIED.
Background
Kenneth M. Boudreaux and William J. Nolan (collectively “Plaintiffs”) worked for Banctec, Inc. (“Defendant”) as computer repair technicians (“CRT”). Defendant assigns computer-repair work, or “service calls,” to its various CRTs who work out of their home offices. Before leaving their home for a service call, a CRT must perform, as Plaintiffs call them, “administrative…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by219 opinions
- Port of South Louisiana v. Tri-Parish Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Lang v. DirecTV, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
- Carroll v. Am. Empire Surplus Lines Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2017
- Hesseltine v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2005
- Hunt v. McNeil Consumer HealthcareDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.