Legal Opinion

Maddox v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 7, 1955No. Reap. Dec. 8484; Entry No. A-24, etcPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement involves 10 entries of cameras and parts, exported from Czechoslovakia between November 1950 and September 1951, and imported by or for the account of American Equipment Company, Inc., of Atlanta, Ga. One appeal covering the 10 entries was filed in the name of “American Eq. Co. Inc. Deceased, by Joe G. Maddox.” Thereafter, an appeal, covering warehouse entry No. A-24, and amended appeals, covering the *413other entries, were filed in the name of “Joseph G. Maddox, as Trustee of and former director of American Equipment Company, Inc., Dissolved.”

At the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Gump Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Wool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Eggen v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. United States v. Humphrey & MacGregor, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API