Legal Opinion
School Board v. Caudill Rowlett Scott, Inc.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided April 21, 1989No. Record 861159PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
We must sustain a motion to dismiss this appeal on jurisdictional grounds. Our consideration of the motion involves Rule 1:1, which provides that final judgments, orders, and decrees remain under the trial court’s control for 21 days after entry, and no longer; Rule 5:9, which prescribes the mandatory 30-day period after final judgment within which a notice of appeal must be filed; and Code § 8.01-428(B), which provides for the correction of judgments to remedy clerical mistakes.
On July 26, 1984, the School Board of the City of Lynchburg (the Board) filed a motion for judgment against a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Commonwealth of Virginia Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- Shipman v. FletcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Raymond Thomas Council v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- Cutshaw v. CutshawSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
- Dorn v. DornSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Davis v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- Super Fresh Food Markets of Virginia, Inc. v. RuffinSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. RemleySupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- Board of Supervisors v. BOARD OF ZONINGSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.