Legal Opinion

Dorn v. Dorn

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 12, 1981No. Record 800951PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARMAN, S.J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The sole issue here is whether Rule 1:1 1 * or Richardson v. Moore, 217 Va. 422, 229 S.E.2d 864 (1976), precludes a trial court, under Code § 8.01-428(B), 2 from correcting, nunc pro tunc, a mutually unintended drafting error contained in a divorce decree.

With the aid of their attorneys, James D. Dorn and Paula C. Dorn (now Paula C. Benoit), in the process of obtaining a divorce, drafted and signed a stipulation agreement, which included a provision for the support of the couple’s two children, James G. Dorn and Brian R. Dorn. The stipulation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cofer v. CoferSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  2. Raymond Thomas Council v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  3. Cutshaw v. CutshawSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  4. Alig v. AligSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  5. Lamb v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Gary Nelson JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  2. School Board v. Caudill Rowlett Scott, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  3. Wellmore Coal Corp. v. Harman Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  4. Lamb v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  5. Helms v. ManspileSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API