Legal Opinion
Levin v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 27, 1967No. 352PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
The ultimate issue in these cases is whether the holders of the Class B stock of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (MoPac) are entitled to vote separately, as' a class, on the proposed plan of consolidation of MoPac and Texas and Pacific Railway Company (T & P) into the newly formed Texas and Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (T&M). An application has been filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission requesting permission to effect a plan of consolidation under §§ 5 (2) and 5(11) of the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended, 54 Stat. 905, 908 (1940), 49 U. S. C. §§5(2) and 5(11). MoPac’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. 5¼% Secured Serial Bondholders' Committee v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- In Re Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1955
- Slayton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1964
3Cited by33 opinions
- Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- In the Matter of Nancy S. Marchiando, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of State of Illinois, Department of the LotteryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Norman P. Singer v. Thomas F. Dungan Benjamin Flammey the Cambridge Institute, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Agrico Chemical Company v. M/v Ben W. Martin (Ex: M/v Greenville), Etc., Defendants-Third-Party v. Brent Towing Co., Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- National Conservative Political Action Committee, John T. Dolan, Chairman v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.