Legal Opinion
Slayton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided July 13, 1964No. Nos. 63 C 436(2), 64 C 48(2), 64 C 77(2)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEREDITH, District Judge.
These three cases, consolidated.for the limited purposes of pre-trial discovery and hearings on motions, in major part arise out of the agreement of the Boards of Directors of defendant Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (hereafter MoPac) and Texas and Pacific Railroad Company (hereafter T&P) to consolidate the two companies into Texas and Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (hereafter T&M), a new Delaware subsidiary of MoPac created for the purpose of the merger, upon approval of the merger by the Interstate Commerce Commission. Subsequent to the filing of the first of…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Levin v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Levin v. Mississippi River Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Levin v. Mississippi River CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. SlaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Slayton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.