Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Wade
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 29, 2002No. 00-6249PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
In this diversity of citizenship action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1382(a)(1), defendants, Julius Jennings Wade, Jr., James H. Wade, Margaret Godley (“Godley”), Godley, Inc., and Wade and Wade, Attorneys at Law, appeal from the district court’s order awarding Plaintiff Pauli Anderson (“Anderson”) $111,200.53 in compensatory damages and $500,000 in punitive damages for their fraudulent representations in connection with an option contract arising under Kentucky law. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
The present case…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Stanley L. Boswell v. Robert Mayer and Melinda CieslinskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United Parcel Service Co. v. RickertKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ventas, Inc. v. HCP, INC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Dorothy Clark, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Clark v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Lisa Weatherby v. Federal ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Bell v. Zurich American InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Raymond E. Fontaine Trust v. P & J Resources, Inc. (In re P & J Resources, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.