Legal Opinion

Intravascular Research Ltd. v. Endosonics Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 13, 1998No. CIV. A. 97-533 MMSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.

I. Introduction

Intravascular Research Ltd. (“IRL”), a United Kingdom company located in Isle-worth, England, brought this action against Endosonics Corporation (“Endosonics”), a Delaware corporation with its princijpal place of business in Sacramento County, California. IRL filed three counts: Count I alleges Endosonics has infringed IRL’s U.S. Patent No. 5,590,659 (“ ’659 Patent”), Count II seeks a declaration of non-infringement with respect to Endosonics U.S. Patent No. 4,917,097 (“’097 Patent”), and Count III requests a declaratory judgment that IRL…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foxfield Villa Associates, LLC v. RegnierDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
  2. Applera Corp.-Applied Biosystems Group v. Illumina, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API