Legal Opinion
Aluminum Ass'n v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 17, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-0291(HHG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendants’ motion to dismiss and plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment in a long-running dispute over plaintiffs’ claims to refunds for excess payments on rail shipments of scrap aluminum within California in 1981 and 1982. For the reasons stated below, the Court will deny plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and grant defendants’ motion to dismiss.
I
In this action, plaintiffs seek to enforce a 1981 order issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission pursuant to section 204 of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, 49…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Cross-Appellees v. San Antonio, Texas, Acting by and Through Its City Public Service Board, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Aluminum Company of America v. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- National Ass'n of Recycling Industries, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Container Corporation of America and Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated v. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- National Classification Committee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. v. Maine Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Fitzpatrick v. Morgan Southern, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2003
- Engelhard Corp. v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002