Legal Opinion

Reading v. Reading

California Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1892No. 14761PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

—This is an action for divorce, a division of the community property, and for the custody of the children. The grounds upon which plaintiff relies are extreme cruelty and habitual intemperance. In the first count it is alleged that plaintiff and defendant intermarried at Oroville, Butte County, January 8, 1873, and that plaintiff has been a resident of the state of California for more than ten years prior to the commencement of the action. The plaintiff then proceeds to allege specific acts of cruelty by defendant, at their residence in Oroville, extending from May 8,1884, to December, 1890.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haskell v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Green v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Forney v. ForneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lambert v. Southern Counties Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hopkins v. Contra Costa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Rose v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Siaca v. BrunetSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1907
  5. Siaca v. BrunetSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API