Legal Opinion
Nutrasweet Co. v. Vit-Mar Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 5, 1997No. 96-5496PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
In this grey market case, the district court entered a “temporary restraining order” that had remained in effect for seventy-seven days as of the time of the filing of appellant’s notice of appeal. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that we have jurisdiction to review that “temporary restraining order,” and we will remand to the district court with instructions to vacate it.
I. Background
Nutrasweet sold certain shipments of its sweetener Equal to Vitmar Enterprises and the Shiba Group at a 50%-75% discount based on the condition that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Sims v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,870 San Francisco Real Estate Investors v. Real Estate Investment Trust of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Chicago School Finance Authority, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Chicago United Industries, Ltd. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- H-D Michigan, LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- FMC Corp. v. Control Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Smith v. LasterDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Colahar v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.