Legal Opinion
Smith v. Laster
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 26, 2011No. Civ. 11-380-SLRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Dennis L. Smith (“Smith”) and Helen S. Starchia (“Starchia”) (together “plaintiffs”) filed the instant litigation pro se against defendants J. Travis Laster (“Laster”), Vice Chancellor for the State of Delaware Court of Chancery; Scott Dailey (“Dailey”), recorder of deeds for Sussex County, Delaware; and nominal defendant Patricia A. Meyers (“Meyers”). 1 (D.I. 1, 3) Contained in the complaint and amended complaint are motions for permanent injunction under 42 U.S.C. § 2000a-3 to enjoin Laster’s “void judgment.”
II.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Devlin v. The Town of Fenwick IslandDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Elad v. Truist BankDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Jean Germain v. Hon. Haekyoung Suh, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- PETER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- PETER v. STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024