Colahar v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
SUE L. ROBINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1. Introduction. Plaintiffs Jan’e Cola-har (“Jan’e”) and Rudolph Colahar (“Rudolph”) (together “plaintiffs”) proceed pro se and have paid the filing fee. They filed this lawsuit against defendants Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and U.S. Bank, National Association (“US Bank”) (together “defendants”) alleging the, wrongful foreclosure of real property located at 53 Hempstead Drive, Newark, Delaware, “involving a bankruptcy discharge.” (D.I. 2.) Plaintiffs challenge a judgment as “void” and allege that “the expected end results are an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lance v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roggio v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Cooper v. CrowlDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Roggio v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- THE FABRICSHIELD, LLC v. RENE SCHLEICHER CO.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024