Legal Opinion

In re Siegel

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 15, 1919No. 138PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. In the matter of David Siegel, bankrupt. Petition of Oscar Quinto to revise an order of the District Court.

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Circuit Judge.

February 14, 1918, at the first meeting of creditors, David Siegel, the bankrupt, offered a settlement of 37 per cent, in cash and payment of all priority claims, the expenses of the proceeding, and $1,000 to reimburse a committee of creditors for the amount expended by them in employing counsel to make an investigation into the failure and the assets and liabilities of the bankrupt at that time. The offer was accepted by a majority in number and amount of the creditors and the amount necessary to carry it out duly deposited.

April 9, 1918, an order of confirmation was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re HollinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  2. In re HollinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Isidor Klein, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. Lane v. Haytian Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Nixon v. MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Realty Associates Securities Corp. v. Newman & BiscoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  5. Harris v. Supreme Plastics, Inc. (In Re Supreme Plastics, Inc.)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API