Legal Opinion
Imprint Technologies, Inc. v. Commissioner of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 1, 1995No. C0-95-293PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
FACTS
U.S. Workforce, Inc. (Workforce) engaged in pad printing, screen printing, spray painting and displays. Workforce filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on December 26, 1991. On March 1, 1993, the case was converted to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Workforce is listed in the Department’s records as going out of business on March 31, 1993. R. Brett Hanson (Hanson) was responsible for making day-to-day management decisions for Workforce.
On February 10, 1993, Imprint Technologies, Inc. (Imprint) filed its articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State’s office. On February…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Super Grade, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Commerce & LaborIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Imprint Tech. v. ECONOMIC SEC. COM'RCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995