Legal Opinion

Imprint Tech. v. ECONOMIC SEC. COM'R

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 1, 1995No. C0-95-293Published

1Opinion of the Court

535 N.W.2d 372 (1995)

IMPRINT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Relator,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF ECONOMIC SECURITY, Respondent.

No. C0-95-293.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 1, 1995.

Don Bedelle Fuller, Minneapolis, for relator.

Kent E. Todd, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and Decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., and RANDALL and HOLTAN,[*] JJ.

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

FACTS

U.S. Workforce, Inc. (Workforce) engaged in pad printing, screen printing, spray painting and displays. Workforce filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on December 26, 1991. On March 1, 1993, the case was converted to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Workforce is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API