Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramunno

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 17, 2010No. 18-13312PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Anthony Michael Ramunno, Jr. pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud and one count of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343 respectively. As part of his plea agreement, Ramunno agreed to forfeit his ill-gotten gains to the Government. The district court entered a preliminary order of forfeiture by consent. Thomas Martin, one of Ramunno’s victims, petitioned the district court to amend its preliminary order of forfeiture, contending that he was entitled to a constructive trust in the funds he invested with Ramunno. The district court granted the Government’s motion to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Preferred Sites, LLC v. Troup CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,549, 18 Ucc rep.serv.2d 588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles Phillip Elliott, Charles O. Farrar, Receiver-Appellee, Kenneth J. Davis, Linda J. Davis, Leroy H. Moeller, as Personal Representative of the Estates of Adolph Hagstrom, Squire J. Kingston, Elizabeth Woods, Caroline Estelle, Lynnis H. McClain Ted Masco, Anita K. Hailey, Earl Setterblade, Francis Setterblade, Lloyd Schutzman, Shirley Schutzman, Albert C. Heil, Melvin Burkhardt, Rosa Ella Burkhardt, Howard Dore, Ruth Dore, Gerald J. Braun, Christie Braun, Monica Brooke Braun, C. Albert Ducharme Trust and Catherine F. Ducharme Trust, Seaton F. McDaniel Josephine McDaniel Trudy and Sidney Kleiner, Claimants-Appellants. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles Phillip Elliott, Charles O. Farrar, Receiver-Appellee, Melvin Burkhardt and Rosa Ella Burkhardt, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. United States of America, and Claremont Properties, Inc., Intervenor/plaintiff-Appellant v. Jannette E. DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc. United General Marketing, Inc., Classic Sales, Inc., Charles W. Jones and Robert E. Lee, Defendants-Crossclaim- General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim- Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, Iii, William J. Purvis, William L. Sikkelee and Consolidated Trading Co., Joseph Lee Smith, Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, United States of America, Movants. Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, William J. Purvis and William L. Sikkelee, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, United States of America, MovantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. FleetCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. United States v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  3. Willis Management (Vermont), Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Wadsworth v. TalmageOregon Supreme Court · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API