Legal Opinion

Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc. United General Marketing, Inc., Classic Sales, Inc., Charles W. Jones and Robert E. Lee, Defendants-Crossclaim- General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim- Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, Iii, William J. Purvis, William L. Sikkelee and Consolidated Trading Co., Joseph Lee Smith, Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, United States of America, Movants. Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, William J. Purvis and William L. Sikkelee, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, United States of America, Movants

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 9, 1994No. 92-8192PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

14 F.3d 1507

RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8489

MITSUBISHI INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant,

CARDINAL TEXTILE SALES, INC.; United General Marketing,

Inc., Classic Sales, Inc., Charles W. Jones and

Robert E. Lee,

Defendants-Crossclaim-

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

General Sales & Leasing Co.,

Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim-

Plaintiff-Appellee,

Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc.,

Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff,

Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. and Skein Dyers of

America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees,

Raymond B. Lippincott, III, et al.,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
Charlesbank Equity Fund II v. Blinds to Go, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
Badami v. Sears (In Re AFY, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
Country Best v. Christopher Ranch, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
Hilao v. Estate of MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.