United States v. Wilson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLS, Senior District Judge:
Petitioner-Appellants Richard A. Gray, Jr., Gray Investment Partners, and Cumberland Hill Capital Fund, L.P., 1 (collectively “Gray”) appeal the district court’s order dismissing their third-party petition to adjudicate property interests in forfeited property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand.
I
A
Stefan Wilson operated a fraudulent investment fund. His Ponzi scheme took almost $13 million from over 50 investors. Gray was among the investors.
By January 2008, the Government had been investigating Wilson for some…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Elk Grove Unified School District v. NewdowSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Cunningham v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Wadsworth v. TalmageOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- United States v. PeckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Blackbird Capital PartnersDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.