Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 2011No. 09-10330PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLS, Senior District Judge:

Petitioner-Appellants Richard A. Gray, Jr., Gray Investment Partners, and Cumberland Hill Capital Fund, L.P., 1 (collectively “Gray”) appeal the district court’s order dismissing their third-party petition to adjudicate property interests in forfeited property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand.

I

A

Stefan Wilson operated a fraudulent investment fund. His Ponzi scheme took almost $13 million from over 50 investors. Gray was among the investors.

By January 2008, the Government had been investigating Wilson for some…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Elk Grove Unified School District v. NewdowSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Cunningham v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2013
  3. Wadsworth v. TalmageOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  4. United States v. PeckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Blackbird Capital PartnersDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API