Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Hammer

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichard J. Cardamone, J.

The defendant moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to the Civil Practice Law and Rules (3-211, subd. 7).

As a result of an accident which occurred on November 4,1903 on premises located at 812 Almond Street, in the City of Syracuse, New York, an action was instituted by the plaintiff, by the service of a summons and complaint, on November 21,1963. An answer was interposed on December 17,1963, with a demand for *1097a verified bill of particulars. No bill of particulars was served upon the defendant. On January 20, 1964 a motion was made, returnable in this court, to preclude the plaintiff from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curren v. O'ConnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. In Re the Estate of WestbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Fry v. BennettThe Superior Court of New York City · 1858
  4. Wilcox v. National Shoe & Leather BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. James Talcott, Inc. v. SchildhausNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. GIBSON PRODUCT CO., INC., ETC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Parsons v. ParsonsNew York City Family Court · 1975
  3. Tarbell v. JacobsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994
  4. Photosound, Inc. v. GourdineNew York Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API