Legal Opinion

Curren v. O'Connor

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1952PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

Plaintiff wife brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries; her husband, in a companion cause of action, sues for medical expenses and loss of services incidental thereto; both charge defendants with negligence. By two separate motions, each defendant challenges the legal sufficiency of the complaint under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Special Term denied their motions; the Appellate Division reversed and granted the motions to dismiss. If, of course, in any aspect of the facts stated, plaintiffs are entitled to recovery, the complaint should not have been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. . Transit Development Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Higgins v. MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Pomerance v. PomeranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Brown v. Davenport Holding Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Nelson v. SmeltzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. A. S. Rampell, Inc. v. Hyster Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Prouty v. DrakeNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Harvey v. HammerNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. Ole Olsen, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Allen v. Thousand Island Park Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API