Legal Opinion
Photosound, Inc. v. Gourdine
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur E. Blyn, J.
Motions under calendar Nos. 208 and 209 of July 19,1984 are consolidated for disposition.
The instant motions seek to hold in contempt Patricia Jacobson and Anne Carson, two Assistant Corporation Counsel who have acted as attorneys for respondent, the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA).
These motions are so devoid of merit that, ordinarily, the court would dispose of them summarily and turn its attention to more deserving matters. The court believes, however, that at a time when the Special Term, Part I Calendar often exceeds 200 motions…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harvey v. HammerNew York Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by4 opinions
- A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v. LezakNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Burrows v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Photosound, Inc. v. GourdineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Nassau County Department of Social Services v. F. G.New York City Family Court · 1989