Legal Opinion
Sarafin v. Sarafin
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 2, 1968No. File 17947PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
This is an action for divorce on the ground of intolerable cruelty. The defendant husband denies the allegations of intolerable cruelty, and the sole issue is ivhether the plaintiff has sus tained her burden of proof. See Bloomfield v. Bloomfield, 144 Conn. 568, 569. Whether or not the defendant husband has been guilty of intolerable cruelty to the plaintiff wife must be determined in the light of the established law of this state, and it may be well to review that law.
“Incompatibility of personalities is not and has never been a ground for divorce in Connecticut. Under our law, married…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McEvoy v. McEvoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Kilpatrick v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Vanguilder v. VanguilderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Beck v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Bloomfield v. BloomfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ChurchillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lea'e v. Lea'eHigh Court of American Samoa · 1986