Legal Opinion

Beck v. Beck

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Errors predicated upon the correction of the finding are not well taken. The credit to be attached to the testimony of the plaintiff was for the court, and the court has found, as the finding discloses, in important particulars, adversely to his testimony. The finding, uncorrected, does not present a case from which we can say, as matter of law, the conclusion of intolerable cruelty must be drawn. In determining such issue, we are controlled by these rules of law. The finding must show not only acts of cruelty on the part of the defendant, but facts which show that in their cumulative effect…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McEvoy v. McEvoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Vanguilder v. VanguilderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. Sarafin v. SarafinConnecticut Superior Court · 1968
  3. Nowak v. NowakConnecticut Superior Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API