Legal Opinion

In Re Chateaugay Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 12, 1989No. 386PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

891 F.2d 1034

133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2139, 58 USLW 2431,

113 Lab.Cas. P 11,717

In re CHATEAUGAY CORPORATION, Reomar, Inc., The LTV

Corporation, et al., Debtor.

In re LTV STEEL COMPANY, INC. and Tuscaloosa Energy

Corporation, Debtors.

UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, Appellant,

v.

LTV STEEL COMPANY, INC. and Tuscaloosa Energy Corporation, Appellees.

No. 386, Docket 89-5024.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued Sept. 11, 1989.

Decided Dec. 12, 1989.

Barbara J. Hillman, Chicago, Ill. (Mark S. Stein, Michael H. Holland, Cornfield and Feldman, Chicago, Ill., of counsel; John Quint, Markewich,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Communications Workers of America, an Unincorporated Association v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Lone Star Steel Company v. National Labor Relations Board, and United Mine Workers of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  5. United Mine Workers of America, International Union v. U.S. Steel Mining Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Mine Workers v. Thames Development, Ltd.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API