Norris v. Texas Employment Commission
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant contests the decisions of the Texas Employment Commission (TEC) and the trial court that he was not qualified to receive unemployment benefits. We affirm.
Appellant was employed at Texaco’s main plant in Port Arthur. Texaco and the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers (OCAW) operated under a bargaining agreement which expired at midnight on January 7, 1982. The OCAW sought approximately sixteen modifications of the agreement. Two months of prior negotiations had proved fruitless. Late in the day on January 7, the OCAW offered a forty-eight hour extension of the agreement. Texaco…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Firemen's & Policemen's Civil Service Commission v. BrinkmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Fire Department v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Washington v. Reliable Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
- Texas Employment Commission v. HolbergTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Mollinedo v. Texas Employment Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Collingsworth General Hospital v. HunnicuttTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. v. Department of Employment & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Anderson v. BD. OF REV. OF INDUS. COM'NUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Collingsworth General Hospital v. HunnicuttTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Davis-Lynch, Inc. v. Texas Employment Commission and Celedonio S. Reyes, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1991