Legal Opinion

Holt v. United Security Life Insurance & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 1, 1909PublishedCited by 26 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pitney, Chancellor.

The first trial of this action resulted in a judgment of nonsuit, which, upon error, was reversed by this court. Holt v. United Security Life Insurance Co., 45 Vroom 795. The new trial thereupon granted resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for substantial damages, upon which judgment has been entered, and that judgment is now under review for alleged trial errors.

The following is the case presented by the record and bill of exceptions: In the fall of the year 1899 Chapman was in possession of a lot of land in Atlantic…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Bernstein v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Worthington & Co. v. GwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. O'Neill v. Supreme CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  5. Cederberg v. RobisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Broadway Maintenance Corp. v. RutgersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Dale v. Thomas H. Temple Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lowrie v. CastleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Beefy Trail, Inc. v. Beefy King Int'lDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  5. Borough of Brooklawn v. Brooklawn Housing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API