Legal Opinion
East Denver Municipal Irr. Dist. v. Doherty
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 30, 1923No. 889PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, District Judge.
Motions have been made by the plaintiff in each of the foregoing actions to strike out the answers and the separate defenses, and for summary judgments for sums of money. The plaintiffs are public corporations. Actions were prosecuted in the Supreme Court of Colorado by taxpaying landowners under section 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure of that state, which reads as follows:
“See. 14. Action against Associates under Common 'Name. When two or" more persons, associated in any business, transact such business tinder a common name, whether it. comprises the names…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- D'Arcy v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Flexner v. FarsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Coane v. Girard Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Fennell v. BacheCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943