Legal Opinion

Copeland Yards v. Taranoff

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEossman, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff, J. W. Copeland Yards, from a decree in favor of the defendants Peter L. and Anna Taranoff invalidating a materialmen’s lien against real property owned by the defendants. The other defendants listed in the title of the case are not involved in this appeal.

The suit was instituted to establish and foreclose a lien for building materials supplied to a building contractor for the construction of a dwelling house on the Taranoff’s property. The building materials valued at approximately $4000 were supplied by the plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the business of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nicolai-Neppach Co. v. PooreOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. R. H. Freitag Manufacturing Co. v. Boeing Airplane Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dolder v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Layrite Products Company v. LuxIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Wallis v. Crook County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Henderlong Lumber Co., Inc. v. ZinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Steel Products Co. of Oregon, Inc. v. Portland General Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API