Legal Opinion

American Canyon Fire Protection District v. County of Napa

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1983No. Civ. 50834PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROUSE, Acting P. J.

Appellants, American Canyon Fire Protection District and its commissioners, appeal from a judgment denying them relief in a mandamus/prohibition proceeding against respondents, the County of Napa, the county’s board of supervisors and board members.

The facts are undisputed. On August 28, 1979, respondent board of supervisors held a duly noticed and published public hearing as required by section 98.6, subdivision (b), of the Revenue and Taxation Code, for the purpose of determining the distribution of $544,392 in special district augmentation funds (so-called…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People Ex Rel. Chapman v. RapseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Lewin v. St. Joseph Hospital of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Wilson v. Hidden Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Patterson v. Central Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Personnel Commision v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. American River Fire Protection District v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Great Oaks Water Co. v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist., California Court of Appeal, 6th District2015
  5. California Attorney General Opinion 23-1101, California Attorney General Reports2024

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API