Legal Opinion

Brand v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 1941No. 8 Div. 125PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The case is not governed by the general rule announced in Smith v. Goldsmith et al., 223 Ala. 155, 134 So. 651, that the validity of the marriage is determined by the law of the place where contracted.

The state thus states the true contention:

“* * * that the law which governs this case is the provisions of Section 7425 of Code of 1923 [Code 1940, Tit. 34, § 38] and the interpretation placed thereon by the appellate courts of this State. Section 7425 of the Code reads as follows:
“ 7425. Rights of parties to remarry after divorce. — When a decree has been rendered granting a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Van Voorhis v. . BrintnallNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Lanham v. LanhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Pennegar v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  4. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
  5. Osoinach v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Copeland v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Oliver v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Strousse v. STROUSSE.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  5. Schurink v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API