Legal Opinion
Strousse v. STROUSSE.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided November 19, 1975No. Civ. 650PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Judge.
This is a petition for writ of prohibition or other appropriate relief to be directed to the Judge of the Winston County Court of Law and Equity. This court, is called upon to prohibit the trial court from allowing further hearings to be held.
The dispositive issue is whether the intervenor’s motion to intervene was timely filed. We answer in the affirmative and the writ is denied.
The pertinent facts appear to be as follows :
Petitioner, Babette Lee Strousse Basch, purportedly married intervenor, Harold Basch, in 1966. Sometime thereafter (apparently in 1973 or 1974) Harold Basch…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Simms v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. Baker. Public Utilities Commission of District of Columbia v. Baker. Case v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Scott Cuthill v. Ortman-Miller MacHine Company, and J. Carter Miller, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Randolph County v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Magee v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
- Duncan v. First Nat. Bank of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Ex Parte Caremark RX, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Root v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.