Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Theobald

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 13, 2004No. 2002-CA-002109-MRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VANMETER, Judge.

This is an appeal of a summary judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court upholding an arbitration decision in favor of appellees. The Sweeneys appeal, arguing that they were not contractually bound to submit to arbitration and that summary judgment was premature. For the reasons hereafter stated, we affirm.

In 1999, appellees Michael and Barbara Theobald (“Theobalds”), listed for sale their property at 9903 Glenda Court, Louisville, Kentucky. The listing agents for the Theobalds were appellees Santosh Bhatt and Joseph Simms. On October 29, 1999, appellant James Patrick…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Campbell v. PreeceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Duteil v. MullensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. City of Murray v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Klatch v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Tyler v. OnztsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Braxton v. O'Charley's Restaurant Properties, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
  2. SMA Portfolio Owner, LLC v. Corporex Realty & Investment, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015
  3. Bazemore v. Papa John's USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
  4. David Dixon v. Pnc Bank, National Association Successor in Interest by Merger to National City BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024
  5. Gaskins v. Swope Ventures, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API