Legal Opinion

State v. Knowles

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1985No. 20376PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant Martin Leo Knowles appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of motor vehicle theft.

The first issue of substance raised by defendant is the propriety of the jury instruction on entrapment, which stated that the defense would be proven only if “the police conduct ... would be effective to persuade the average person to commit a crime....” Defendant correctly asserts that this instruction was improper under State v. Cripps, Utah, 692 P.2d 747 (1984). This error, however, does not warrant reversal because the evidence of entrapment was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. McCardellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. FontanaUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. HutchisonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. GableColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. PattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BranchUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. CobbUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. KayUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. TarratsUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API