Legal Opinion

State v. Kay

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1986No. 20265PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant Douglas Kay appeals from the trial court’s refusal to adhere to the terms of a plea bargain. He pleaded guilty to three counts of capital homicide in exchange for a promise that he would be sentenced to life imprisonment rather than death. The trial court accepted the pleas without objection from the State. Two weeks later, following a change in the State’s position, the court ruled that it was not bound by the agreement to impose life imprisonment. The court gave Kay the option of being sentenced, with the possibility of receiving the death sentence, or…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. State v. CopelandUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. OttUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. HoffUtah Supreme Court · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API