Legal Opinion

NanoMech, Inc. v. Arunya Suresh

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 6, 2015No. 13-3671PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.

NanoMech, Inc. sued a former employee, Arunya Suresh, for breach of her non-compete agreement. The district court 1 granted judgment on the pleadings for Suresh, ruling that the noncompete agreement was unenforceable under Arkansas law. NanoMech appeals, and we affirm.

I

NanoMech, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Arkansas, researches and develops nanotechnologies. The company specializes in creating nanotechnology products in the areas of nanomachining, manufacturing, lubrication, energy, biomedical coatings, and strategic military…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Victaulic Co. v. TiemanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. Sarah McIvor v. Credit Control Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. Great Rivers Cooperative Of Southeastern Iowa v. Farmland Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Bendinger v. Marshalltown Trowell Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Progressive Technologies Inc. v. Chaffin Holdings Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  2. AT&T Corp. v. Aventure Communication Technology, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2016
  3. Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2018
  4. Bell v. Gateway Blend LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  5. Brkthru Digital, LLC v. Apiary Digital, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API