Legal Opinion
State v. Mitchell
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 15, 1986No. 3840PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The state appeals, with the permission of the trial court, from the judgments of the court dismissing the information against each defendant, Jeffrey Mitchell and Howard Tinney, Jr. The state had filed two-count informations against each defendant, charging them with sexual assault in the second degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-71 (a) (1), and risk of injury to or impairing the morals of a child, in violation of General Statutes § 53-21. The principal issue in these combined appeals involves the nature and length of an investigative detention of the defendants, as a result of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. FarrarConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- State v. WilliamsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- State v. AllenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- State v. LeavittConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.