Legal Opinion

Reading Anthracite Co. v. Rich

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 1990No. 48 Eastern District Misc. Docket 1990PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF COURT

2Per curiam

In view of the Opinion and Order entered this date in which the actions of the Chancellor taken after March 13, 1990 have been vacated, the Emergency Application For Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Prohibition filed by Petitioners-Appellants, James J. Curran, Jr., and John J. Curran is dismissed as moot.

NIX, C.J., did not participate in this proceeding. LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT and CAPPY, JJ., did not participate in the consideration and determination of this Emergency Application.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice. 1

Reading Anthracite Company, Schuylkill…

3Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Carpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Process Gas Consumers GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. West Penn Power Company v. GoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Slater v. Rimar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. United States National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Robinson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. City of Philadelphia v. FrempongCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Chalkey v. RoushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API