United States v. Jamison
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JONES, Senior Judge:
Despite their pleas of not guilty, the appellants were convicted by special court-martial of possession of heroin in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The sentences imposed and approved have resulted in review by this Court pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866.
The appellants contend, as they did below, that the evidence introduced to prove their guilt of possession of the contraband drug was inadmissible because it was obtained during an illegal search. The operative facts are relatively simple and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. AyalaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. AyalaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. PhinizyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. BakerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. McCarthyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.