Legal Opinion

State Department of Natural Resources v. City of Waukesha

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1994No. 92-2530PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

This appeal presents three related issues for review:

1) Does sec. 893.80(1), Stats., 1 the notice of claim statute, apply in all actions or only in tort actions?

2) Must the state of Wisconsin comply with the notice of claim statute when bringing a claim against a governmental body?

3) If the notice of claim statute does apply in all actions and if the state must comply with the notice of claim statute, did the state substantially comply with the statute in this case?

We hold that the notice of claim statute, sec. 893.80(1), Stats., applies in all actions, not just in tort actions. We also hold…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gutter v. SeamandelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Figgs v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Instruction v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Thorp v. Town of LebanonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bostco LLC v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Gillen v. City of NeenahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Vanstone v. Town of DelafieldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API