Legal Opinion
Per Aarsleff A/S v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 16, 2015No. 15-873CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pre-award bid protest of a bridge contract planned after a competitively awarded contract was enjoined; justification and approval for sole-source award; standing; motion for preliminary injunction; equitable factors; absence of immediate irreparable injury
OPINION AND ORDER 1
LETTOW, Judge.
This pre-award bid protest of a planned bridge contract has its origin in a prior post-award protest addressed by this court in Per Aarsleff A/S v. United States, 121 Fed.Cl. 603 (2015), appeals docketed, Nos. 2015-5111, 2015-5112, 2015-5135, 2015-5143 (Fed. Cir.). In this further protest, plaintiff Per…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Weeks Marine, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Myers Investigative and Security Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Air Cargo Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Harmonia Holdings Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020