Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re the Trusteeship of Williams

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 1999No. C5-98-1471, C5-98-1504Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLansing, Judge

I agree that the liability limitation in the trust instrument does not exonerate the professional trustee from legal responsibility for its decisions on diversification, but I would base that holding on different grounds. I do not see the distinction, drawn by the majority, between “negligence” and “mistake or error of judgment.” Although some mere errors of judgment may hot be negligence, I do not read the case law to relegate mistakes and errors in judgment to a category of action not included in the tort of negligence. Such a categorization would afford nonprofessional trustees a very…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Hartzell v. SchusterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. In Re Trusteeship Under Agreement With MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Matter of Trusts Created by HormelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API