Legal Opinion
Ecrix Corp. v. Exabyte Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 10, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-K-1151PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*612MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS
KANE, Senior District Judge.
Eerix Corporation’s (“Ecrix”) original complaint requested me to issue a declaratory judgment that it was not infringing any of Exabyte Corporation’s (“Exabyte”) patents. Ecrix manufactures helical-scan drives for recording computer data.1 Exabyte has at least seven patents on methods of recording and reading helically-recorded data. Ecrix filed an amended complaint that in addition to requesting a declaratory judgment of non-infringement also charged Exabyte with antitrust violations, patent misuse, declaration of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Presto Industries, Inc. v. The West Bend Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Big O Tire Dealers, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Zenith Electronics Corporation, and Elo Touchsystems, Inc. v. Exzec, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Easton v. City of BoulderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Innotron DiagnosticsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sensitron, Inc. v. WallaceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2007
- King v. McKillopDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- GFI, Inc. v. Bean Station FurnitureDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
- Bistline v. JeffsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
- Donehue v. Apache CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.