Legal Opinion

GFI, Inc. v. Bean Station Furniture

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided October 2, 2003No. CIV. 197CV01185PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BULLOCK, District Judge.

In November 1997, plaintiff GFI filed a patent infringement action against multiple defendants, including Bean Station Furniture and Futuristic, Inc. (“BS & F”). BS & F filed pendant state law counterclaims charging GFI with unfair trade practice and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage in violation of North Carolina common law. As a result of concurrent litigation in which another district court found GFI’s patent invalid, GFI dismissed its claims against BS & F and the other North Carolina defendants. BS & F’s state law…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Cray Communications, Inc., Formerly Known as Dowty Communications, Incorporated v. Novatel Computer Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blue Rhino Global Sourcing, Inc. v. Well Traveled Imports, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API